logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.13 2017고단254
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the fine shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car at CV.

On December 10, 2016, the defendant, around 23:30 on December 10, 2016, had the front road D, Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, from the 4-dong community service center of the old month to the private distance of the old month.

Since there are vehicles parked on both sides of the road, they have a duty of care to drive safely while accurately operating the steering gear and operation of the steering gear by reducing speed in advance and properly examining the right and the right of the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop on the right side of the road while driving by the victim E, who was standing on the right side of the road, was driven by the victim E, with the front door of the No. N. H-W car owned by the victim G, and the victim G, who continued to be parked, followed by the driver, who was parked in the above No. N. L-W car by being driven by the victim as the front door of the No.S. car at the above No. K-W car, and then was driven by the victim JK5 L-owned by the victim I, who was parked on the front door of the above No. K-W car. After being parked, the victim L-W car owned by the victim K and the front door of the cargo vehicle was parked in the front door of the No. N. NA car.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the above K5 car to the extent that the repair cost, such as exchange of fences, etc., is equivalent to KRW 1,306,660,00; (b) to the extent that the above amount of the car is equivalent to KRW 6,585,220, such as exchange of fences; (c) and (d) to the extent that the above K5 car is equivalent to KRW 1,490,920, such as exchange of pans; and (d) did not immediately stop the above 1,598,725, such as exchange of mos and mos; and (e) escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against K and M;

1. A written statement of G and E;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report accompanied by a specification of repair expenses, etc.);

1. Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Commercial concurrence;

arrow