1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 17, 2007, the Plaintiff entered the military police team of the Air Force Noncommissioned Officers, and served as a training investigator from April 1, 2013 to the military police team of the Air Force B combat Forces as a training investigator.

① On May 16, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the password C of an investigator who became aware of in the course of performing his/her duties at the office office’s office on May 16, 2013, and connects C’s computer, and then combines 18 Korean document files related to female-gun into his/her tronets account and attempts to peruse them.

There was an attempted attempt.

② On June 13, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the investigator’s service numbers and password from his own computer for business in his office, and accessed e-mails sent to C without permission, and deleted them.

③ On May 2014, the Plaintiff’s meeting to report on the weekly situation as instructed by the Chief of Staff;

5.12.12.)" and "the instructions of the Chief of Staff" (Monthly Session of Staff);

5. Two military data, including “27.” were printed out, and a photo is stamped on his/her cell phone and stored it in the cell phone storage medium, and the aforementioned cell phone was removed from the outside without any security review. (B) On September 17, 2014, the Air Force BH Disciplinary Committee decided on the disciplinary action of the Plaintiff for three months of salary reduction on the ground that the Plaintiff’s following acts (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) committed against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) constitute the breach of dignity (the attempted detection of public secrets), the violation of the rules on military police officers of the Air Force, and the violation of the rules on military security (the rules on military security). Accordingly, the Defendant filed a request for an examination of the above disciplinary decision at the Committee on the Review of the Resolution of the Air ForceF head, which decided on October 16, 2014 with respect to the Plaintiff on March 21, 2014.

C. On November 21, 2014, the Plaintiff revoked a disposition of suspension from office to the Appeal Committee of the Disciplinary Action against the Air Force Headquarters.