logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.11.07 2018나200144
불법행위에 의한 손해배상
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court within the scope of the judgment of this court, the plaintiff claimed compensation for damages against the defendant B and compensation for consolation money against the defendants. The first instance court accepted all of them, and the defendants appealed against the above part of the claim for consolation money. Thus, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiff's claim for consolation money against

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a change to the reasoning as follows. Thus, this is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The judgment of the court of first instance was received 5 pages 5, 3, and 5 were changed to "the above judgment was finalized on January 24, 2015," and "the above judgment was finalized on April 2, 2016," and changed to "the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 2, 2016," and "the defendants are clear and white, so the defendants are "(the same mental damage is included to the extent that can be sufficiently anticipated in the nature of the tort in this case even if it is special damage)". The defendants changed to "the defendant's "the defendant" in 6 pages 8, the same as "the defendant," changed to "the plaintiff," and changed to "the plaintiff."

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for consolation money against the defendants should be accepted in its reasoning.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the appeal by the Defendants is dismissed as all of the grounds for appeal are groundless.

arrow