logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.11.07 2014고단1211
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On June 25, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.193% without a vehicle driver’s license on June 21, 2014. From Jeju, the Defendant driven a vehicle in the dbreadth halog halog at the 1km section from the seasonal restaurant near the bathing beach at Jeju to the front of the road at the 1km-do 1 Dob 5-ro “frequency” entrance at Jeju.

B. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle)

While driving the said vehicle at the time and place specified in the port, the driver neglected the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the vehicle in a safe way while driving the vehicle, and by neglecting the central line, the driver’s negligence of the victim E (n.e., the 48-year-old driver) was inflicted on the part of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as crypitis and tension for about three weeks in need of medical treatment, but failed to stop immediately and escape without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. Although Defendant B knew of the fact that he had caused a traffic accident while driving a car as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written circumstantial statement of his driver with the police officer belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station G Zone G Zone, which investigated the said case, refers to the occurrence of a traffic accident; and (b) made the person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment escape by making a false statement, such as his assertion that he was a driver, even though he was driving in the said district.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, a survey report on actual condition, a driver's license ledger (A), and a medical certificate;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 5-3(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the Criminal Act.

arrow