1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s appeal against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition as follows. Thus, the plaintiff and the defendants dispute as they are in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the plaintiff and the court of first instance on the ground of the error ratio of the court of first instance, illegality in calculating consolation money, causation between the accident of this case and the harm of the plaintiffJ, etc. However, even if the appellate court re-examines it, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all of the above arguments by the plaintiffs and the defendants are without merit. Thus, the above arguments by the plaintiff and the defendants are without merit. The plaintiffs' claim against the defendant 2018-3-1420-3-14206-394, 338-1394, 4275, 43614, 46205, 471, 467, 2015.