The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal is the confession and reflect of the Defendant; (b) the mother of the Defendant is difficult to move due to urology, high blood pressure, knee, knee, etc.; and (c) the father of the Defendant is at the location of the Defendant to support his parents and two daughters under the real name of the left eye, etc., the punishment imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant has been punished several times in the past due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (three times a fine and three times a suspended sentence of imprisonment) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time a fine). In particular, on November 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years a suspended sentence of ten months for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment), and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 2012 and conclusive on December 8, 2012, even during the suspended sentence, it is necessary to repeatedly punish the Defendant in accordance with the purport of the amended Road Traffic Act, which is likely to cause damage to another person’s life and body. In light of the Defendant’s aforementioned past records, it is difficult to expect the effect of driving without a drinking license and driving without a license and the Defendant’s environment and circumstances as a result of the instant crime, and the circumstances and circumstances presented by the lower court after considering the following as a whole.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.