The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflects the gist of the grounds for appeal, that the defendant was forced to drive drunkly after hearing the awareness that his father was injured at the time of the instant case, and that the defendant is in the position to support his father and the punishment suffering from mental division, etc., the punishment of imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is deemed to have driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.130% even though the Defendant had already been under the influence of alcohol more than twice, and the case is not less than that. In the past, the Defendant has the past records of punishment (three times of imprisonment, one time of suspended execution of imprisonment, and five times of fine) under the conditions as stated by the Changwon District Court on February 21, 2012, and on June 20, 2012, since the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended execution of imprisonment, five times of fines) and even after the completion of the enforcement of the said sentence, and even during the repeated period of repeated crime, driving under the influence of alcohol is difficult to expect any harm to life and property of an individual as well as any other person, and there is no further need to punish the Defendant by taking into account the following circumstances as a result of the revision of the Road Traffic Act, and there is no further reason to punish the Defendant’s punishment.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.