logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.08.27 2015고단621
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sung-nam Branch of Suwon District Court on November 19, 201, and is still under the suspension of execution, which became final and conclusive on November 27, 2014.

1. Around 09:30 on April 2, 2015, the Defendant driven a D-do motor vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 6 km from the front day of the Jamambadong-dong Subdivision apartment at Sungnam-si to the front day of the entrance of the Dong Park at approximately 67 km to the front day of the entrance of the Dong Park at around 23:20 on the same day.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a DNA car.

On April 2, 2015, at around 09:30, the Defendant operated the said vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 6 km section from the front day of the Jindong-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si to the front day of the 23:20th day of the same day, to the front day of the entrance of the Dong-dong Park.

3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving a DNA franchise driver car;

On April 2, 2015, at around 23:20, the Defendant moved a three-lane road in front of the entrance of the Gandong Park at the 67-dong Park at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si into the direction of Taenam-si, along the three-lanes in the direction of Taenam Park, to a speed of about 20km in the direction of the city.

At the time, there was a duty of care to safely circumvent the intersection by examining the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle driver after the speed reduction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to the negligence of bypassing the above private distance from the left side, and the part of the fronterer and pentum of the Franchis cab driven by the victim E driving the above private distance from the left side in accordance with the new subparagraph.

arrow