Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of 1,500,000 won.

Defendant

D. The above fine.

. As if so, the delivery was carried out;

3. The fraud Defendants submitted two copies of a new service contract in the name of EX, which was forged, as described in paragraph 1, to the victim EV at the time and place described in paragraph 1, as if Defendant D were the victim EX.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim and received two options G-pro cell phone phoness (EZ and FA) equivalent to KRW 1,936,000 from the victim.

"2013 Highest 9441"

1. At around 19:00 on January 15, 2013, Defendant A, along with D, discovered the FE’s personal information through Internet search and informed Defendant A of the FD mobile phone agency operated by the FDB located in the Busan Y-gu FB, Busan, and D of the fact that Defendant A entered the FE’s personal information in the customer name column, “FE”, “FF in the resident registration number column”, “FG building in the address column” * Dong * Dong * * in the address column *, “the applicant column” on January 15, 2013.

As a result, Defendant A forged two copies of the lele mobile subscription application in the name of FE, a private document, for the purpose of uttering in collusion with D.

2. Defendant A, in collusion with D, sent to FC a forged application form in the name of FE, as if it were a document duly formed, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1).

3. The defrauded presented forged documents to the victim FC at the date, time, and place set forth in Paragraph 1, and Defendant A made a false statement as if he/she was FE, and Defendant A made a false statement as if he/she would pay installment payments and monetary charges if he/she had only two cell phones.

However, in fact, when the defendant A and D are delivered a mobile phone from the victim, they are traded as stolen goods and the price is the cost of living.