logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.16 2013고단5051
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 5051]

1. On May 2, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on May 2, 2007, and on October 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5 million by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on October 7, 2013.

On December 2, 2013, at around 23:25, the Defendant driven the unregistered 100CC (CT) under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.125% without obtaining a motorcycle driver’s license from the front side of the cafeteria “scambling in the world,” which is in the arrangement of the pipe, to the front side of the ting station in the front side of the same city.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

The Defendant driven the aforesaid unregistered CT 10CC which did not purchase mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

[2014 Highest 1141]

1. At around 11:00 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant driven a unregistered 10CC 100 under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.236% without obtaining a motorcycle driver’s license on the section of about 1.5 meters from the 151st day of the front side of Sejong Special Self-Governing City to the front side of the Sejong Special Self-Governing City, Sejong Special Self-Governing City, from the 151st day of the road along the front side of the Sejong Special Self-Governing City-Governing City, to the front road of the king-ri 242.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, who was a holder of the aforementioned unregistered CT 10CC (CT) and was driving the said OE without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, the ledger of each driver's license, and detailed descriptions of each control;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Criminal records;

arrow