logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단3145
공무집행방해등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a demand from the victim D (24 years of age) to pay KRW 469,00,00 from the victim D (the employee of the Defendant) at around 05:20, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) paid KRW 410,000,000 to the victim; and (c) again received the victim’s chest from the victim’s head to whom the payment of the drinking value is requested; and (d) assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s face by hand.

2. Around April 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed a defect that the police officer F, who belongs to the police unit E District Police Station in the Yancheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and called “weaks, sweaks, sweaks, sweaks” in order to hear the statements of the instant person in order to process 112 reports; (b) assaulted the police officer F’s sexual organ on one occasion; and (c) assaulted a police officer, a police officer, who was dispatched to the Republic of Korea, on one occasion, when he drinks the breast part; and (d) assaulted the chest part by drinking the fat, who was a police officer under his command, and frighting the breast part into drinking.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each police statement with respect to G and F;

1. Each statement of D, H and I;

1. Notification to the department related to each reported case 112;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on images of each photograph;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 40 and 50 (Crimes of Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant assaulted an employee who makes a legitimate demand while drunk; and (b) interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting two police officers dispatched to the site to deal with the instant case.

Intoxicated

In spite of this, it is not good to use violence against police officers.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the accused has obstructed the performance of public duties and has committed violence.

arrow