logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.08.26 2014고단1202
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that E, the representative director of DD, had a plan to create a Driet on the F site in the Hadong-dong-dong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and was promoting the business, the Defendant was in the position of director of the said company from December 2, 2012; (b)

In order for D Co., Ltd. to carry out the above business, if the creditor banks, who are the right to collateral security on the above site, file an application for a public auction, they shall be awarded the award, and in order to do so, the funds of 9 billion won or more have been required, but at the time D Co., Ltd. had a debt of 3 billion won or more, and had to receive investments from other persons, but investment has not been made.

Around February 2013, the Defendant received a victim H from G who was aware of it, and solicited the victim H to make an investment in the Driet project several times, but he was able to invest 3 billion won when confirming the progress of the project by being awarded a successful bid in the actual public sale. A short sale can be conducted after one month from the above E, and there was no specific expectation that the progress of the Lriet project will be achieved by giving a profecing a profecing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing, such as a person subject to a preferential purchase negotiation.

In March 2013, the Defendant agreed to lend KRW 300 million as the operating expenses of the company to the victim H in the circumstances where the Defendant did not know the trade name near the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gam apartment in the coffee shop where it is difficult to know the temporary progress of the business, and it did not receive an investment of KRW 3 billion from the victim H. In addition, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 600 million by adding interest to KRW 300 million after the lapse of two months without considering the specific method of receiving payment of the actual money when the Dmart business is properly conducted.

arrow