Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2017, at around 17:45, the Defendant moved in front of the fourth female toilets at C University Social Science University, G, Gwangju, about 17:45, and reported that female students of the above university enter a female toilet, and entered the above female student's room, and entered the column side of the change side used by the above female student.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the above toilet against the will of the above female toilet manager.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness D (the name, the same shall apply hereinafter) and each legal statement of the witness E and F;

1. To make a statement to the accused in part of the second police interrogation protocol;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Domestic investigation reports (on-site investigation), field photographs, internal investigation reports (on-site CCTV perusal and analysis), and documents attached thereto, particularly refer to the kids searched searched by the Defendant by entering the Internet portal site before and after the commission of the crime [the results of digital evidence analysis (No. 1)-Carrying phone search records], evidence analysis CD 1 evidence analysis CD [the statements of female students D of the above university that the Defendant sent to the above female toilet] did not seem to be consistent, specific, and false facts from the investigative agency to the court, and it cannot be sufficiently trusted that it was not involved in the error in light of the structure of the above social science university and toilet, the building and toilet of this case, the scene of the crime before and after the crime, and the fact that the Defendant continued to display the toilet entrance from the toilet immediately after the commission of the crime.

In addition, D's statements are sufficiently supported by the circumstances recognized by other evidence mentioned above.

The Defendant confirmed that he was sick within the building of the said social science university for about one hour immediately before the crime was committed, and the Defendant shot up the said building.

Although it is vindicateed, it is immediately after the crime is committed.