1. The plaintiffs' housing site development project for the defendant is in accordance with the contract for the sale of unsettled housing site within the district.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 30, 2004, the Minister of Construction and Transportation, on December 30, 2004, designated and publicly announced a Class A as a planned area for the Housing Site Development Project (hereinafter “instant project”) pursuant to the Housing Site Development Promotion Act, and approved the development plan and implementation plan on March 30, 207, respectively.

(Public Notice D). (b)

1) The defendant (Korea National Housing Corporation and Korea Land Corporation are merged with the defendant on October 1, 2009).

It does not leave before and after the merger, but is "the defendant" only.

A) As part of the relocation measures for those who have lost their means of livelihood due to the expropriation of their owned housing or land, etc. as a result of the incorporation into the instant project district, the Defendant agreed to specially supply the said person’s housing site (Concurrent use of stores) to be developed within the instant project district. Accordingly, the Defendant attached Form 2)

2. On the corresponding date specified in paragraph (3) of the same calculation table with each of the relevant contractors listed in paragraph (2) of the same calculation table, each of the relevant areas specified in paragraph (5) and each of the relevant land listed in paragraph (4) of the same calculation table (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) entered into a sales contract with each of the relevant contractors listed in paragraph (6) of the same calculation table.

3 thereafter, Plaintiffs E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R

2. The rights and obligations of each of the instant sales contracts were succeeded from each of the relevant contractors listed in the calculation table (2) Nos. 4 through 18.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including paper numbers, and branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 2 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Grounds for the claim;

A. The Defendant’s partial invalidation of each of the instant sales contracts is the developer of each of the instant sales contracts, and acquires land, etc. for public works and compensate therefor, which is the basis law for each of the instant sales contracts.