A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 00:03 on October 27, 2016, 2016, when the Do was using the cash withdrawal machine at the convenience store located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan; (b) Doctrine was committed against the convenience store employee who did not work properly; and (c) the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Busan Jin-gu police station D police station, dispatched upon receipt of a report from the above convenience store employee, took a bath, such as “A few parts of the Doctrine, a public official is a vise.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and at the above time and place, took a bath to request the police officer to return home from E in the circumstances surrounding the Busan Police Station D District of Police Station, boomed the ethbbbb, and boomed the eth, and blicked the blicker’s mobile phone shooting to blick the clicker’s cell phone to blick, and blicked the clicker’s cell phone shooting to blick, and blicked the clicker’s left face to blick with the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of 8 Acts and subordinate statutes to 3 on-site photographs, brug photographs of F violence, and brue photographs; and

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (within the scope of the sum of the maximum term of punishment) to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the nature of the crime in this case is poor, that the defendant recognized all the crimes and reflects the mistake, and that there is no criminal punishment record for the defendant after 2003.