beta
Text
1. The criminal facts No. 1 to 3 as stated in the judgment against the defendant are four months of imprisonment and criminal facts of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On November 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 7, 2017, and is currently under suspended sentence.
[Criminal facts]
1. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant against the victim F is obliged to deposit the victim’s H convenience store operated by the Victim F (42 tax) in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the victim “on the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the end, one million won should be first lent to the end to the end.
“.......”
However, the Defendant did not have a claim for the refund of the check amounting to KRW 1,00,000 at the time, and there was no special income as a recipient of basic living expenses, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the check even if he borrowed money from others.
Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 90,000 from the victim on November 17, 2016 to the post office account (J) account in the name of I (J) around November 17, 2016, and acquired KRW 3,380,000 in total over four times from that to December 3, 2016, as shown in attached Table 1.
2. On March 27, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim E by telephone to the victim E (22 years) who is an employee of the convenience store at a place where it is not possible to know the location of the light on March 27, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim E is obliged to pay the time limit when he/she lends KRW 2.50,00 to him/her.
“.....”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have been admitted at the time, and did not intend to use the loan money for the payment of the time, and there was no special income to the recipients of basic living, so even if he borrowed money from others, he did not have the intention or ability to pay
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 250,000 won from the post office account (K) in the name of the defendant around March 27, 2017 from the victim, and as well as from the time to July 8, 2017, the defendant re-written the attached list 2 from that to July 2017.