A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of 5,00,000 investment funds constituted KRW 5,000: (a) around January 2017, at D Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Victim B (39) was prepared to open the G to be contributed by C around March 2017 by C; (b) around 5,000,000 investment funds would be 10% of the profits if the Defendant invested KRW 5,000.

In addition, if the office is the chief of office, 1.8 million won will be paid every month.

B. It stated that the property of the deposit of KRW 88 million is trusted and invested.”

However, in fact, although the Defendant is required to prepare for the opening of an indoor packing machine, the Defendant was in a state of no particular property or income as a recipient of basic living expenses at the time, so it was impossible to open his/her place of residence in the name of the Defendant because the opening of the business was not prepared, and as such, he/she was living in his/her place of residence equivalent to 5 million won of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of KRW 8

On January 23, 2017, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and was delivered KRW 5,000,000 as a check at the trade name in the new-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, as investment money, to the victims.

2. On January 2017, the Defendant of the 41,095,443 loan money was the Defendant of the 41,095,443 loan money and the Defendant of the 41,095,443 loan money borrowed to the Defendant for the use of the loan money in a room equivalent to KRW 88,000,000,000, which is currently residing in a room for construction cost for the purpose of open opening to the public, at the time of the Plaintiff’s entry into the Plaintiff, the Defendant would be able to repay the money by deducting KRW 88,00,000,000 which

“.......”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a claim for the return of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the