Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two and a half years, and imprisonment for a term of three years.

Seized evidence 1 through 5, 7 through 10, 26.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to two years in Busan District Court on November 19, 2007 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On June 14, 2010, the Daejeon District Court sentenced three years to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On April 29, 2013, Defendant A had five records related to larceny, such as termination of the execution of the said final sentence.

Defendant

B sentenced two years to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at Suwon District Court on January 11, 2008. On June 14, 2010, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 4 years to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and completed the execution of the above final sentence on April 29, 2014. However, according to evidence, inasmuch as the history related to larceny appears to be “six times”, it was revised.

[Criminal Facts] The Defendants were convicted of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by habitually combining the so-called apartment vacant houses (a thief) and were convicted of having violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (a thief). After having completed their respective punishments like the above criminal records, they had the intention to commit the crime of “the removal of apartment vacant houses” again around November 2014.

The Defendants: (a) decided that the apartment complex is an apartment complex that is a large-scale vehicle that purchased and prepared in advance for the commission of the crime, and returned to the country, which is an apartment complex that is a large-scale vehicle that is an object of the crime, and the cost of which is easy to enter; (b) decided that the apartment complex is the object of the crime, such as informing the residents of the entrance to the apartment site without the entry to the Defendant B, and (c) decided that the apartment site is an apartment unit that is subject to the crime, if it is confirmed that there is no person inside the house by dividing the first class into the apartment site, the Defendant B will play a role in gaining money and valuables by intrusioning the entrance by the omission, etc. prepared in advance.