logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.04.10 2013고단129
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) are the drivers of CDap Motor Vehicles;

On March 30, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on March 16:15, 2012, and proceeded with the first way in the vicinity of the village in the west-gun, Gosung-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

At the same time, the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, and the road was be bended rapidly, and at the same time, the front range of the road was not well visible, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed in advance and accurately manipulate the steering gear, thereby safely driving the vehicle along the ongoing lane to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the defendant is driving without neglecting this at a speed and without reducing speed.

On the other hand, the injured party D (the older 31) driven by the E Car in the direction of the defendant's driving, who was driving in the direction of the defendant's driving, was faced with the back part of the E Car in front of the driver's seat of the above C Car, and the injured party F.F. (the older 26) was driving the car in the above C Car in order to provide approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the injured party F.F. (the older 26) who was driving the car in the above Cren Car suffered from the power of a conical signboard requiring approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, even though the above Cren Car was damaged in an amount equivalent to approximately 758,294 won of repair cost to reduce the surrounding scatterings, it was immediately stopped and escaped without any measure such as saving the injured party.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance. However, the Defendant operated the said multi-use vehicle as above at the date and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1.

arrow