logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.11 2012가합6687
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The parties concerned Plaintiff A received an operation at Aju University Hospital established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); Plaintiff B’s spouse, Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.

B. (1) On October 14, 2010, Plaintiff A received the instant surgery from the Defendant Hospital on the following grounds: (a) around October 14, 2010 due to a traffic accident, Plaintiff A received the instant surgery by using metal sagrails for the 1,2,3, and 4 occasions (hereinafter “first fixed operation”).

(2) On May 2, 2011, Plaintiff A was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital and removed a fixed object that was administered for the crypation from May 3, 201, by anesthesia around 17:55, and was charged to DBM (Deminationationation) which is a substitute for aggregate (hereinafter “instant operation”), and the said operation was completed on May 3, 201 at the end of 19:55 on May 3, 201.

C. (1) On May 3, 201, Plaintiff A moved from the recovery room to the sick room on or around 20:57, and on May 4, 2011, according to the result of the verification of food and clothing status on or around 02:30, the Defendant hospital’s medical team determined that it would be less than her from anesthesia, and that the Defendant hospital’s medical team was to observe the progress by no later than 0:0 am.

(2) Around 06:30 on May 4, 201, as a result of the verification of the state of consciousness, the Plaintiff observed that “the Plaintiff’s answer at the time, place, and people are divided into one time, and that it was not correct.” The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital complained of the oral and oral symptoms, and the Plaintiff’s medical personnel suspended the administration of non-pharmaceutical drugs at around 07:30 on the same day, and carried out the cerebr-I shooting for the Plaintiff.

(3) As a result of brain MIM shooting, the color of both brain parts was observed, and the vertebrate Angio-CT was implemented to assess the blood status of the vertebrate beer beer, and as a result, there is no continuity of the left vertebrate beer abandonment, and there is no narrow vertebrate beer opinion, i.e., spine beer.

arrow