logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.08.31 2018고단1838
입찰방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When an electronic bid for the supply of food materials in the School Meal Electronic Procurement System (EAT) is submitted to the cyber exchange operated and managed by the Korea Agricultural and Fishery Products Distribution Corporation, it shall not be allowed to lend the name of another company or to make a duplicate bid for the same public announcement in the same area.

Nevertheless, from around 2010 to around Daejeon, the Defendant operated a school meal service supplier company with the trade name “D” in the Jung-gu, Daejeon. In most cases, the Defendant established a school meal service provider with the trade name “I” in the cyber Exchange of Agricultural and Fishery Products operated and managed by the Korea Agricultural and Fishery Products Distribution Corporation (EAT) for the purchase order for school meal service materials in the area of Daejeon. In order to increase the successful bid rate for the supply of school meal service materials, the Defendant was willing to establish a food service supplier company under the name of his/her family in the same bidding on the same bidding case for the purpose of raising the successful bid rate for the supply of school meal service materials and made a double bidding. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant issued a notice to the Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon in the name of the head of the Dong-gu, Daejeon, with the name of “G” (hereinafter referred to as “I”) and changed the name of “I” into “I”, and received the same bid in the name of each designated bid.

On February 14, 2014, the Defendant participated in the name of “D” bidding, which is ordered and managed by the Korea Agricultural and Fishery Products Distribution Corporation in the name of “D”. On February 17, 2014, the Defendant instructed K employees around February 17, 2014 to participate in the bidding under the name of “I”. On the other hand, K tenders to participate in the bidding under the direction or bid in the name of “I” in the name of “D” by either participating in the bidding under the name of “I” in the direct PC room, and thereby winning the said supply contract from around that time to July 15, 2016.

arrow