Do 2015 13857 A. Larceny

(b) Intrusiond buildings;

A

Defendant

Law Firm AE

Attorney in charge of AF, AG, AH

Jeju District Court Decision 2015No24 decided August 20, 2015

March 24, 2016

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the evidence duly adopted by the court below, it is just to acknowledge the facts of the public prosecution of this case (excluding the part of innocence) as guilty on the grounds as stated in the judgment of the court below, and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the indirect evidence and impeachment evidence, the probative value of proof and impeachment evidence, the principle of direct trial attention and the principle of direct trial attention by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations like the argument of the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

The presiding judge Park In-bok

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Kim So-young

Justices Lee Ki-taik