beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff A, as well as 5% per annum from March 28, 2011 to November 26, 2015, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the party is a juristic person that operates the Sejong Pungdong Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); the Plaintiff was a person who received the fluoral mathic mathic mathic mathic mathic mathic mathic mathic mathic mathics at the Defendant Hospital;
B. On March 17, 2011, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant’s hospital operated by the Defendant due to pains caused by the left-hand fladism, and on March 28, 201, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant’s hospital for the instant surgery. On the 28th day of the same month, Plaintiff C’s doctor C of the Defendant hospital for the instant surgery to the effect that the instant surgery was carried out, as well as the instant surgery, the instant surgery was conducted by adding all of the instant surgery to “the instant surgery.”
2) On April 20, 201, Plaintiff A was discharged from Defendant Hospital on April 20, 201, and was hospitalized again on the following day after the instant surgery.
5. 21. The discharge was 21.
3) On July 27, 2011, Plaintiff A was consulted with the doctor D of the Gyeongbuk University Hospital. (c) Plaintiff A’s disability was 5% permanent disability of Plaintiff A, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, due to the Mabrone’s disease (vocational coefficient 6), the Mabromone’s disease (occupational coefficient 6) and the Mabrone’s disease, which led to the 2-L-1 (the part part of the non-resistant resistant movement and the part of the path of the path)’s 9% damage to the Mabromosis (the part of the pathy) and the 3-A-c-1 (the part of the pathy of the pathy) of the 5% permanent disability of Plaintiff A, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
[Reasons for Recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4, 8, 9 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)
record, the result of the examination of medical records on the director of the Busan University Hospital, the result of the physical examination on the director of the Busan University Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. Before the plaintiffs' assertion of this case, not less than the physical restriction, sacrificism, sacrificism, and neutic damage to the plaintiff A.