1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

The part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited part of the judgment, “1. Basic Facts and Judgment 2.B.” from the judgment of the court of first instance, is from the first head to the 10th 6th son of the first head of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal or deletion as follows, is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second 18-19th 2th 19th son of the judgment of the first instance, “Defendant E shall dismiss “Defendant E” as “the changed service officer,” and delete “Defendant E members” in the 19th st st son.

The term "the member of the Defendant's School Council" shall be deleted from 7th below the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment.

"A evidence No. 48, Eul evidence No. 27, and fact-finding results with respect to G of the court of first instance" shall be added to "a ground for recognition" in the 8th five to eightth half of the judgment of the court of first instance.

A new part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 10 7th or lower as follows:

C. In full view of the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant Student Association sought the preparation of the instant report on the basis of a specific intention and ordered the Plaintiff to make a specific production thereof, and the evidence submitted including the evidence as stated above, evidence Nos. 15, 73, 77, 78, 80, 84, and evidence Nos. 84, and evidence Nos. 11 and 12, as well as evidence Nos. 17, 23 through 32, 34, 36, 48, 75, and evidence Nos. 11 and 12 as follows.

The notice of the conclusion of the instant research service contract clearly states as the contracting party, G demanded supplementation, etc. in accordance with the instant research service contract to the Defendant Association, which is not the Plaintiff, and G entered into the instant research service contract with the Defendant Association, and G entered into the instant research service contract with the Defendant Association.