1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is dismissed.

(b) the defendant.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are the same as the statement from the second to the fifth fifth fifth to the fifth fifth to the court's second fifth decision, except for the dismissal, addition, or deletion of part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. As such, this part of the court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

▣제1심 판결문 3쪽 표 중 ‘채무자 J’란의 ‘간이감정결과표 기재 중개업소 시세정보(원)’란의 “하위평균 1억 9,500만 원”을 “하위평균 1억 9,000만 원”으로 고쳐 쓴다.

▣제1심 판결문 3쪽 아래에서 7째 줄의 '하고,“와 ”원고가“ 사이에 ”원고가 이 사건 채무자들에게 대출금을 지급한 후“를 추가한다. ▣제1심 판결문 3쪽 아래에서 3째 줄의 “아래 표와”를 “별지 표와”로 다시 쓴다. ▣제1심 판결문 3쪽 마지막 줄의 “543,018,556원을”을 “543,018,566원을”로 다시 쓴다. ▣제1심 판결문 4쪽 표 및 그 아래의 “실제 대출가능금액- 실제 취득세 과세표준액 × 담보비율 - 소액임차보증금 2,200만 원"을 삭제한다.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The Defendants conspired with the Plaintiff for the purpose of allowing the instant obligor to loan more loans, and submitted to the Plaintiff a false sales contract prepared by increasing the transaction amount than the actual sales contract, and the acquisition tax payment slip and receipt accordingly modified.

Accordingly, after calculating the amount of loan available to the debtor of this case based on the above false documents, the plaintiff suffered losses by adding a total of KRW 160,000,000 to the loanable amount calculated by the actual transaction amount on the wind to pay the loan to the debtor of this case.

Even if Defendant A did not participate in the above illegal acts, the employer is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages that Defendant B caused to the Plaintiff in relation to the performance of duties, and the same content is the Plaintiff.