Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is in conflict with the victim B (the 30-year old age), who is hedging.
At around 02:40 on May 25, 2019, the Defendant, at the “D” store operated by the victim in Ssung C, wanted to know about the entrance at the time of teaching with the victim, on the ground that the victim did not open the entrance at the time of teaching with the victim. However, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance at a drinking place; (b) laid down the entrance at the entrance; and (c) expressed the desire to “the victim would be dead” with the victim; and (d) laid down the door, which is a dangerous object in a nearby place, and embling the entrance; and (c) expressed the same mechanism as putting the entrance, the Defendant threatened the victim as if he would inflict any harm on the victim’s life or body.
Summary of Evidence
1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);
1. The police statement concerning B;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on bricks, photographs, and letters;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the same kind and fine, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the same kind and fine; (b) the crime committed by contingently in light of the relationship between the defendant and the victim; (c) however, it is not possible to reach an agreement with the victim; (d) the victim’s person who is suffering from uneasiness, etc. as a result of the crime is the victim’s petition for severe punishment; and (e) the defendant’s age, character, career, career, environment, circumstances of the crime and result, etc. are considered in the records and arguments of this case, and all