The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s penalty (fine 3,000,000) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

나. 피고인 B (1) 사실오인 피고인 B는 발로 피해자의 다리 부분을 차는 시늉만 하였을 뿐 실제로 찬 사실이 없음에도 불구하고, 이 사건 공소사실을 유죄로 인정한 원심판결은 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다.

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (hereinafter referred to as a fine of KRW 3,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) Defendant A led to the confession of the instant crime; (b) appears to be against the victim; (c) the degree of injury suffered by Defendant A appears not to be serious; and (d) Defendant A did not have any criminal records exceeding the fine; or (c) the instant crime is not unfair because the Defendants inflicted bodily injury on the victim who was seeking access to the said apartment at night when the lawsuit is pending in relation to the dismissal of Defendant A from office of D Apartment Management Office; (d) the Defendants did not have any agreement with the victim; and (e) the Defendants did not agree with the victim; and (e) other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing in the instant case, such as the age, character, conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against Defendant A is too unreasonable.

나. 피고인 B (1) 사실오인 주장에 대하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 이 사건 범행현장에 설치된 CCTV 영상에 피고인 B가 발로 피해자를 차는 장면이 촬영된 점, ② 피해자가 수사기관에서부터 원심법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 피고인 B가 발로 자신을 찼다고 진술한 점, ③ F도 경찰에서 피고인 B가 발로 피해자의 다리 부분을 밀었다고 진술한 점 등을...