logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2019.07.03 2019고단66
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) is a person who is engaged in driving a benz car.

On January 18, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 21:59, and led the Down-gun C to proceed in front of the D cafeteria in the direction of “F” restaurant at the seat of the E Hospital.

Since there is a narrow frame where a commercial building is densely concentrated, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering gear and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently driven a drinking, and received the back of the driver’s seat of G H7 car parked in front of the above D cafeteria by the Defendant’s driver’s negligence, and received the back of the driver’s seat of G H7 car in front of the above D cafeteria.

Afterwards, the Defendant continued to drive the said car in the direction of the Shos Police Station in the vicinity, and left to the left in the direction of the Ird of the Shos Police Station. At around 22:02 of the same day, the backer of K's L new character car parked in the front of J is the fronter of the Defendant's vehicle. On the other hand, the backer of the M's Nmat car parked in the front of the said new character vehicle has been the fronter of the Defendant's vehicle, and the above M's vehicle has been pushed down in the fronter of the Ethr vehicle, and the above Ethr vehicle has become the backer of the P P P of the O parked in the front of the Ethr.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as providing personal information, to the Defendant’s vehicle with repair cost equivalent to KRW 450,371 on the above job-related part, so that the said new garr vehicle can be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,753,800, and the repair cost equivalent to KRW 3,188,000 on the said Matr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wr-Wer vehicle is destroyed by each repair cost equivalent to KRW 250,00,000 on the road.

arrow