logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 13. 선고 2018다227667 판결
(심리불속행)[일부패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court-2016-Na-12316 ( October 12, 2018)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

In order to enter into a deposit account title trust contract, there must be an agreement between the debtor and the holder of the deposit account that the debtor holds the ownership of the deposit claim and takes profits from the management thereof in the internal relationship.

Related statutes

Article 30 (Cancellation of Fraudulent Act)

Cases

2018Da227667 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

[Judgment of the court below]

Appellee

Korea

Defendant, Appellee and Appellant

Maximum 00

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court-2016-Na-12316 ( April 12, 2018)

Imposition of Judgment

13, 2018.13

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow