logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.05.15 2015가단3291
제3자이의
Text

1. The defendant's enforcement of the Gwangju District Court's 2010Ddan3501 (main office), and 2010ddan4726 (Counterclaim) judgment against C.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Defendant, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of Gwangju District Court 2010ddan3501 (main office), 2010ddan4726 (Counterclaim), performed compulsory execution against C with respect to corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet in the Gwangju District Court Da, 102 Dong 503 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. The Plaintiff and C are legally married couple who reported their marriage on September 17, 2014, and are married on September 20, 2014 and reside in the instant apartment.

C. C C’s ownership of corporeal movables listed in the attached list is not owned by the Plaintiff, because the Plaintiff purchased corporeal movables for marriage with C, or purchased by the Plaintiff’s branch.

Therefore, the defendant's status C is as to C.

Compulsory execution against corporeal movables listed in the attached Form shall be prohibited based on an executory exemplification of the judgment stated in the paragraph.

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow