logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.06.17 2015가단971
제3자이의
Text

1. For corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet:

A. Defendant Ambacon Co., Ltd.

Reasons

Defendant B and C completed the seizure execution of the instant corporeal movables on January 13, 2015, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment rendered on December 18, 2014 (hereinafter “instant corporeal movables”), which was recorded in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant corporeal movables”) on January 6, 2015 on the basis of the executory exemplification of the judgment rendered on December 18, 2014 by the 2014Gapo-Gun Court Decision 20132 rendered on February 18, 2014; Defendant Asung-B Co., Ltd. completed the seizure execution of the instant corporeal movables on January 13, 2015 based on the executory exemplification of the payment order issued on November 28, 2014 by the Jeonju District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch of the Non-Party Company (hereinafter “Non-Party Company”); the fact that the instant corporeal movables owned by the Plaintiff, not the Plaintiff, and between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B and the Defendant C pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, each compulsory execution against the corporeal movables of this case, which is not owned by the non-party company, should be dismissed. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case, which sought this, shall be accepted for all reasons.

arrow