1. The Defendant (Counterclaim) produces, sells, or lends a non-powered golfball supply machine listed in the attached Table 1 list.

A. In the case of claim 1, the golf machine supply system (hereinafter "paragraph 2 invention of this case") consisting of the golf machine from the saw-to-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-s to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-t to-

However, the premise of the claim 1 is the same as the invention of this case. The remaining part of the claim 1 is a functional expression that describes the function, effect, etc. of the golf galle cancellation device, and the plaintiff specified its technical composition by the "claim 2" 【The plaintiff specified its technical composition by the " Claim 2." Thus, the claim 1 is examined as to whether the "claim 2" of the I patent is infringed.

【The main drawings of the claim 3】(2)(3)(2)(2)(2)

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)’s status as the Defendants is a company with the purpose of developing and constructing golf facilities, and manufacturing golf products. Defendant C is the actual operator of the Defendant Company. 2) The Defendants are “Defendant C’s non-powered golf game supply machine (hereinafter “Defendant Products 1”).” as indicated in the attached Table 1 from March 2014 to March 201.