beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff, D, and E were prosecuted for the following criminal facts:
- The Plaintiff: (a) around August 8, 201, the Defendant (Plaintiff) around 23:30, at the “G singing point” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) on the ground that, when Defendant (Plaintiff) 1, the president of the Banbmester, performed music music, the victim D, who was the president of the Banbmester, caused the Plaintiff to bunde the bundbage of the victim, destroyed the bundage into the upper bottom of the upper upper bottom of the upper upper bottom, followed the victim’s body and followed the victim’s body for 2-3 weeks medical treatment.
- D and E: Defendant A provided the victim A (Plaintiff) at the above date, time, and at the above place that “I wish to sat back and die with her natives,” and carried out the e such as E where he was eating at a nearby restaurant, etc., the victim’s face was satisfed, and the victim’s face was satched and satisfed in drinking on the road near the sating shop, and Defendant E jointly carried out her fat, etc., in order to trace the victim’s satch, and thereby, Defendant E jointly carried out the victim’s fattop, etc. requiring two weeks of treatment.
B. On April 4, 2013 due to the above criminal facts, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of injury, and KRW 1.5 million for D and E were sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act).
(Seoul Southern District Court 2012Seoul High Court 1347).
Although the Plaintiff, D, and E appealed from the above judgment, the appeal was dismissed on June 13, 2013 (Seoul Southern District Court 2013No604), and the appeal was dismissed on October 17, 2013.
(Supreme Court Decision 2013Do7934). D.
Defendant B was appointed as a public defender from the first instance court of the above criminal case on May 10, 2012, and the decision of appointment of a public defender on September 19, 2012 was revoked, and Defendant C was appointed as a public defender at the appellate court and the Plaintiff was defended.
[Ground] Evidence Nos. 3 through 5, as a whole, and all pleadings.