beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 4, 2013, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of injury on the grounds that the following criminal facts were found in Seoul Southern District Court 2012 High-Ma1347 (hereinafter “relevant criminal cases”).
On August 8, 2011, the Defendant (Plaintiff) around 23:30, at the “G musical shop” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul. Around August 8, 201, when the Defendant, who is the Banster, performed music music, the victim D, the president of the Banster, caused the music noise, and followed the victim’s body, and followed the victim’s body, which requires 2-3 weeks of medical treatment.
B. D and E were sentenced to a fine for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) for the following facts in a criminal case related to the same day (D. 1.5 million won and E. 1 million won), D and E were subject to the applicable provisions of Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act.
Defendant
D said date, at the same time and place, the victim A (the Plaintiff) provided that “I will satisfe and die with her natives, and die with her he/she,” and she carried out e, etc. that he/she was eating out of a nearby restaurant, and then satched the victim’s face, etc. on the road near the sating shop, satisfying the fat around the victim’s sat, and the Defendant E also jointly carried out satch satfum that requires two-day medical treatment to the victim by sating the satch of the victim’s fat.
C. All appeals (Seoul Southern District Court 2013No604) and appeals (Supreme Court 2013Do7934) against the judgment of the Plaintiff, D, and E related criminal cases were dismissed, and the relevant criminal case judgment became final and conclusive.
Defendant B was appointed as a public defender in the relevant criminal case on May 10, 2012, and the decision of appointment of a public defender on September 19, 2012 was revoked, and Defendant C was the Plaintiff at the appellate court of the relevant criminal case.