Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the "E" non-profit private organizations located in the D church located in the House C at his own Government.

No person shall arrange or solicit the employment of any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, on November 6, 2015, the Defendant, while holding the status of stay for general training (D-4) that issues to students who learn fishing science at a fish teaching institute affiliated with a university and arranged four foreigners, including Cambodian nationality F (G), H (I), J (K), L (M), and L (M), who entered the university on November 10, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness P;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police on P;

1. A report on investigation (a report on monetary details);

1. The investigation report (the confirmation of the case related to witness P) (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the defendant only carried the students in Cambodia and used the "O" factory operated by Cambodia, and that there was no fact of arranging employment.

However, there are the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., that there is a female student who will work in the investigative agency and this court with consistently reported job offer advertisements.

On the following day, 10 men have been on the 10th of the next day, and 10 people have been on the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20

The Defendant stated that: (2) the Defendant did not call with P at the time of the initial investigation by the immigration management office; and (3) the Defendant asserted that there was no visits to P’s factory; (2) the details of P and several calls were confirmed; (3) the Defendant was carrying the Cambodia students and recognized facts between the above factory; and (3) the Defendant was carrying the above students in this court.