logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.07 2016고단2803
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B’s fine for KRW 700,00, and Defendant C’s fine for KRW 1,000,00, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2015, Defendant A operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name “F” on the first floor of the commercial building located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, with a view to having female employees find the said business establishment engage in sexual intercourse.

From August 2015 to March 10, 2016, the Defendant established six rooms with showers, simplified beds, etc. in the above business establishment, received 130,000 won from customers with no name and provided guidance to the indoor room, and let female employees B, C, etc. do sexual intercourse with customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B served as an employee at the foregoing establishment from February 27, 2016 to March 10, 2016, and received KRW 130,00 in return for his/her personal or unsound act with one customer and sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

3. The Defendant, from February 23, 2016 to March 10, 2016, worked as an employee at the above business establishment and performed a similar act with four customers with no name, and received 130,000 won in return.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B and C: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant C”) and the selection of each fine

1. Defendant B and C in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “Chocks favorable to the following sentencing grounds”);

1. Probation, community service order or order to attend a lecture: Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.; and

arrow