The defendant dismissed the application for compensation order of this case by the applicant for compensation of this case.

The summary of the judgment of innocence of this case is summary.

1. At around 10:00 on September 23, 201, the Defendant: (a) plucked up the right arms of the victim D (the age of 66) in front of the Ecafeteria restaurant, and inflicted an injury on the victim by plucking up the right shoulder for about 12 weeks of treatment, without any reason, while under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, D’s statements, medical certificates, copies of medical records, and each fact-finding inquiry letter are presented to the court and investigation agency.

In light of the above evidence, at around 10:00 a.m. on September 23, 201, the Defendant and D conflict with each other and the Defendant plucked up or plucked up D’s arms, D’s visit the F Hospital at around 11:53 p.m. on the same day to the intention to visit the F Hospital at around 17:00 a.m. on September 23, 201, and the intention to this effect is doubtful that “the f.o., exceeded 201.” and the intention to this is doubtful that D’s ref.m. from that date.

9. The fact that he received treatment by the above member of the Council every four days until October 26, 201, D was treated twice due to symptoms, such as the chroud, tension, etc. of the shoulder pipe at G Council members around October 201; D received one-time medical treatment due to the symptoms, such as damage to the froud and power lines, heat, etc. from H Council members; D did not receive medical treatment from a medical institution due to symptoms of the shoulder part; D had not received treatment due to the symptoms of the shoulder part; on the other hand, more than seven months after the occurrence of the instant case; on May 10, 2012, at the I Hospital, after being diagnosed with the extreme tear, the extreme part-time tear or heating; on the other hand, at the same hospital on the 12th day of the same month, the Defendant received eight-time medical treatment from the 15th day of the instant hospital; on the other hand, at the 15th day of the instant hospital, Defendant 215th day of the instant disease.