A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2014, at around 0:30, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.153% which is difficult to drive normally, without obtaining a driver’s license. On September 7, 2014, the Defendant driven a vehicle with a C observer in the state of difficulty to drive normally, along the two-lanes between the two-lanes of letter, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of letter-based roads adjacent to the Seocho-gu Office, 1601, west-ro, west-ro, 1601.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol while it is difficult to drive the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by returning the traffic situation at the front time and driving.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and shocked the back part of the victim D's driving driving in the same direction at the front side of the above car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as the injury of the side flussium in the well-flusium, the side flusium, and the victim E, who is the flusium, for about 8 weeks of treatment, such as the flusium flusium in the left-hand flusium abandonment, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Report on the statement of the status of a drinking driver, and the written report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Each diagnosis letter asserts that the accident of this case occurred because the victim D invadedd the victim D's own central line, leading to the front side of the Defendant's driving vehicle, which led to the accident of this case. The defendant asserted that the victim D could not expect that the victim D would make an illegal internship, and that he could not avoid the accident of this case.

However, even if the victim D violated the central line, it was illegal internship.

In other words, each of the above evidences is admitted as follows.