1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) jointly with the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) D and E, each of which amount to 5,000,000 won, and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) F. 17.

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

1. Basic facts

A. Party 1) The Plaintiffs are “G Council members” located in Busan Seo-gu I (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”).

(2) Defendant F is a person who takes images at the Plaintiff hospital and Defendant D and E is a parent of Defendant F.

B. Around J 14:36, Defendant F was born at the delivery room of the Plaintiff Hospital, and transferred to the newborn baby room. A assistant nurse H belonging to the Plaintiff Hospital, at around 15:30 on the same day, was cut back a white, which contains hot water, and was placed on the newborn bed, and was placed on the Defendant F on the part of the Defendant. Around 15:30 on the same day, Defendant F incurred two degrees of images (i.e., 3% of the instant accident) on the left part, left part, left part, knish, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Defendant F received medical treatment at K Hospital, a video specialty hospital, from December 5, 2014 to December 15, 2014; and Defendant F transferred the said hospital to the Yangsansan National University Hospital, and was respectively carried out of the medical staff of the said hospital on December 16, 2014, and on December 23, 2014.

3) At present, Defendant F: (a) the loss of the part above the left blue part and the annual installments part above the left blue part due to image; (b) the upper half of the upper half of the size of 7.5x4cc is observed; (c) the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the blue; and (d) the upper half of the upper half of the 3 cm back to the lower half of the blue (hereinafter “instant reflect”).

c) A criminal judgment against H is in the state of occupational injury on the ground that the instant accident was committed by negligence on the ground that the instant water containing hot water contained in the live white paper, and that the water injection of the water in the live white paper was not properly checked, and that there was negligence on the part of the head, not on the side of the Defendant F’s bridge, and that the water injection of the water in the live white paper was not on the side of the Defendant F’s bridge, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 6 million by the above court on December 17, 2015 (based on recognition). There was no dispute (based on recognition), Gap’s evidence 6 and 13 (including a live number; hereinafter the same shall apply).