1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 9,737,460 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its amount from January 21, 2015 to July 12, 2017.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

On January 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 20:30 on January 20, 2015, suffered from an accident where he/she suffered from an injury of spawn and spawn spawn on the left side of the 1,2 spawn and spawn spawn (hereinafter “instant accident”).

At the time, the defendant spits the stone at the time of drinking 2-3 meters of the size of 2-3 meters, along with the smelting sound of the stone, while the defendant was in the same place of work with two employees of foreign customers and one employee of the foreign customers, and was spiting the stone at the time of drinking the restaurant, which was spiting the stone from the restaurant, and the restaurant was spited, and the restaurant was spited with the stone.

On January 28, 2015, the Plaintiff Company sent a letter of apology to the Defendant and expressed its wish that the treatment would be well completed, as it is scheduled to take measures to enable the Defendant to receive treatment through an insurance company.

The Defendant received psychotropic treatment and universal file treatment from the Gangnam-gu Hospital from January 26, 2015 to June 26, 2015 due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 9, Eul evidence Nos. 13 (including provisional number), witness D's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

According to the facts of recognition of responsibility, the plaintiff must pay attention not to enter food provided to customers while running the above restaurant, but neglecting this fact and caused an accident where the defendant, who was able to learn water leakage, did not discover any stone coming from the water leakage and caused the accident where the sweak was cut off. Thus, the plaintiff is liable to compensate for all damages suffered by the defendant due to the accident in this case.

The plaintiff was suffering from the accident of this case from the 1, 2, and so on, the plaintiff suffered from the 1, 2, 2, and there is no big lives from the water leakage in the two lives, and the defendant left the same lives.