1. The Defendants and the designated parties E shall jointly serve as the Plaintiff 19,81,134 won and the year from September 18, 2015 to August 10, 2016.

1. Evidence 【Evidence】 1-1, 2, A2, A3, A4, A5-1, 2, A7-1 through 25, A8, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. On November 13, 2014, the Plaintiff runs cargo transport business under the trade name “F” and runs cargo transport business with 25.5 tons of cargo vehicles.

B. A contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) on September 2015, Defendant B demanded that the Plaintiff transport approximately 16 tons of a stone in Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “the instant stone”) to the construction site located in Chungcheongnam-do and transport the stone to the construction site located in Chungcheongnam-do, but again, the Plaintiff demanded transport of the stone to the construction site located in the wife G in the area of the Sinsi-si (hereinafter “instant construction site”).

C. The service contract E between E and the Defendant C entrusted the Defendant C with the work of lowering and transporting landscaping stones, including the instant stones, within the construction site of this case.

(1) On September 17, 2015, the Plaintiff stopped a vehicle while the vehicle first arrived at at the construction site of this case around September 17, 2015, while getting off the other stones, the Plaintiff left the cream, and stopped the vehicle so that the creamble article can be cut off and cut off.

(2) Defendant B, the director of the instant construction site, was preparing to look together with the on-site human body, and Defendant D, the engineer of the instant construction site, was preparing to look back.

The staff of Defendant B connected the instant stone to the rain (I, hereinafter “the instant rain”) with the rain (hereinafter “the instant rain”), and connected the chain to the rain (hereinafter “the instant rain”) only one place of the stone of this case.

Defendant D set up the stone of this case as Defendant D, and in the process, the stone of this case was fluored and the chain was cut, and the stone fell into the freight owned by the Plaintiff (J, hereinafter “instant freight”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). (3) The stone of this case was separated from the cargo of this case, and it was divided into two sides.