beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years.
2. Defendant B
(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Defendant B, along with A, had the F apartment 1, 50,000 won and monthly 450,000 won of the F apartment 1,500,000 won and monthly 500,000 won of the window of Changwon-si, which A leased from E and resided. However, when A borrows money as security for the above apartment, the Defendant was able to act as if he was a lessor E, and the said apartment was able to make a false statement as if the deposit for the lease was greater.
1. Fraud;
A. In collusion with Defendant B and A, around November 16, 2010, Defendant B and A made a false statement that the former deposit amount of the said apartment was KRW 65 million to the victim G, and the former deposit amount of the said apartment was KRW 65 million. Defendant B made a false statement that “I would make a payment without the mold if I lend the money.” Defendant B made a false telephone conversation with the victim G in the irregular land, and Defendant B made a false statement that “I would make a payment without the mold.” The former deposit amount of KRW 65 million is KRW 65 million to the victim.”
However, in fact, Defendant B was not E, and the deposit for the lease of the above apartment was not KRW 65 million, and A had no intention or ability to repay even if it borrowed money from the victim.
Nevertheless, Defendant B and A deceiving the victim as such, and have been transferred KRW 58,779,00 through seven times from November 16, 201 to April 20, 201 from the victim’s account.
B. On November 30, 2010, Defendant B made a false statement in collusion with Defendant B that, “A shall make a payment without mold if he/she lends money,” with the victim I, and Defendant B shall make a telephone conversation with the victim, “A is a lessor of F apartment 1,506,50,000,000,000,000 won, and A’s deposit is 65,50,000,000,000,000 won.”
However, in fact, Defendant B was not E and the deposit for the lease of the above apartment is also 6.0