Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person selected as a person in need of emergency dwelling support from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, who is the victim, and the defendant A is the owner of H and 101 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant house”), and the defendant C is the real estate real estate agent.

1. Upon approval of Defendant B’s application for emergency fund assistance of KRW 75 million on November 2013, the Defendants drafted a charter contract in the amount larger than the actual lease deposit, and made a public offering in order to use the difference for other purposes.

At around November 12, 2013, the Defendants, at the J real estate office in the operation of Defendant C, which was located in the king-si, prepared, under his/her supervision, one of the following conditions: (a) the lessor, lessee (occupant), B; (b) the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million from November 30, 2013 to November 29, 2015; (c) LH subsidy of KRW 66,50,000; and (d) the tenant, the head of the Gyeonggi-do branch of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation; (b) the tenant, B; (c) the occupant; and (d) the head of the branch office of the Gyeonggi-do branch of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation; and (d) one of the lease lease contracts of KRW 350,000,000,000,000 for the lease contract of the former rental housing owned by the Defendant C; and (d) the head of the K Dong, 72, and

However, in fact, the actual deposit for the lease of the instant house was not KRW 70 million but KRW 50 million.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendants prepared a lease and a lease contract as if the actual lease deposit of the instant house was due to the cause of KRW 70 million, and submitted it to the victim. Accordingly, the Defendants were transferred from the victim the sum of KRW 3.5 million to the account of Defendant B’s community credit cooperatives on the 29th of the same month as the emergency housing support fund, and KRW 63 million to the account of Defendant A’s national bank.

2. Defendant C, in violation of the Licensed Real Estate Agent Act on November 12, 2013, did not appear to have caused KRW 70 million, even though the deposit for the lease of the instant house was KRW 50 million at the above J Real Estate Office, as in paragraph (1) above.