1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

1. The basic facts;

2. The plaintiffs' assertion;

3. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment regarding the defendants' liability for damages are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of the first instance court Nos. 8 and 9 and the second instance Nos. 9 and the second instance No. 8 of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

"(However, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments as a result of the request for the examination of the medical records to the head of the Dong-dong Hospital of the first instance for the examination of the medical records on the head of the Dong-dong Hospital of the first instance, it can be recognized that the plaintiff's cerebral cerebral typhism occurred due to stress. Thus, it cannot be concluded that the medical personnel of the defendant hospital continued to do so in the course of performing each of the instant operations to the plaintiff A, and that such cerebral typhism was caused by the negligence of the medical personnel. However, since the above cerebral typhism cannot be disregarded that caused stress to the plaintiff, this circumstance is considered to determine consolation money.

The following facts are acknowledged in light of the results of the first instance court’s examination on the medical record examination on the negligence not diagnosed cerebrovascular, violation of the duty of care guidance, and the first instance court’s examination on the evidence Nos. 4-1 through 4-2, and the first instance court’s examination on the records of the medical record on the head of the GOIG, and the first instance examination on the head of the GOIG, and the first instance examination on the body examination on the head of the GOG, and the first examination on the following facts.

① In principle, Plaintiff A’s cerebrovascular is due to cerebral chrochissis. In the event of cerebral chrochissis, the risk of re-cerebral chrossis is high, and serious psychotropic mergers, including death, may occur, and thus, treatment should be provided as soon as possible.

② The Plaintiff A.