1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from October 1, 2012 to December 11, 2013, and the following.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Recognizing the facts of recognition, the Defendant settled the loan amount of KRW 70,000,000 on December 17, 2009 as KRW 25,00,000,000, KRW 40,000 on February 10, 200, KRW 40,000 on April 8, 2010, KRW 15,000 on April 23, 200, KRW 25,000 B 25,000 on May 6, 200, KRW 200, KRW 15,000 on the loan amount of KRW 15,00,00 on May 10, 200, KRW 00 on the loan amount of KRW 15,00,00 on the loan amount of KRW 15,00,00 on May 9, 200, KRW 200 on the loan amount of KRW 300,000.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence 1, 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and evidence 2 (the defendant's appearance and the defendant's appearance are not written. However, according to the result of the appraiser F's written appraisal, the defendant's argument is without merit, since the defendant's assertion is recognized as the defendant's penology,) and Eul's evidence 2 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a loan of KRW 50,000,000,000 according to the settlement details of the instant case and interest or delay damages thereon.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff also sought payment of the amount equivalent to the above money by asserting that the amount of KRW 5,00,000 for E has not been repaid, in addition to the loan amount of KRW 50,000,000 according to the settlement details of this case acknowledged earlier, but according to the settlement details of this case, it is recognized that the Defendant paid KRW 5,00,000 to E for the Plaintiff on May 6, 2010, and otherwise, it is recognized that the Plaintiff paid the amount of KRW 5,00,000 for the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff on May 6, 2010.