logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.12.28 2011재고합39
특수범죄처벌에관한특별법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is that North Korea, who took 625 U.S. in the Republic of Korea in violation of the Constitution and took part in the Republic of Korea for the purpose of returning it to the Republic of Korea, and changed the 625 U.S.’s crym for the purpose of taking part in the Constitution by indirect invasion, thereby claimed a disguised peace, unification, negotiations between South and North Korea, etc., and encouraging the Government to reflect on the government’s policies, thereby encouraging the conflict within the country and the disturbance of civil deliberation. In particular, even after the Revolution since the April 19 Revolution, North Korea, as an indirect invasion, went against the social order by impairing the nation’s national security by taking advantage of the disturbance of the social order through a series of public policy strategies as an indirect invasion, was sufficiently aware of the Defendant’s attempt to make a hostile attack under the name of the Republic of Korea through the unification of Korea, and if it prevents any political activities in any form, and thus, causes any harm to the fundamental order of the nation, it is thereby detrimental to the existence of the Republic of Korea.

A. As a member of the E, the Defendant, as a member of the F regime, is called “the two major legislative bills” where the National Assembly proposal was promoted in order to strengthen the state of anti-public attitudes at the time and prevent the dynamic confusion of society.

In the public announcement of the national flag of the Republic of Korea, there is an essential bill for the public announcement of the anti-government flag, and it is a principle, unrealistic, and significant risk for national unification in light of the political characteristics, geographical characteristics, and the overall circumstances of domestic affairs, the two bills are actively opposed to the two bills in E office and the so-called Anglo-China unification theory should be developed as a pan-national movement, respectively.

arrow