[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

10 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

(b) the defendant;

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, who is engaged in real estate development business, was close to the I and investment relationships, and I operated “J” and “K” (hereinafter “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called”), which is an unauthorized entertainment store, and received an investigation and a tax investigation. As a result, I attempted to receive money and valuables from the I under the pretext of making a solicitation or delivering money to the person in charge so that the investigation and tax investigation can be completed smoothly through the staff of the investigative agency and the staff of the tax office known to the Defendant.

1. On October 8, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the first police officer around October 2014, 2014, the Defendant demanded that I request the staff of the investigative agency of the Republic of Korea, “J,” “K,” and “K, to request for a good handling of the case without permission.” Accordingly, the Defendant received KRW 5 million in cash from I in the Defendant’s office located in L around October 8, 2016, at the Defendant’s office located in L, for teaching expenses.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation or good offices concerning cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. On October 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5,00,000 from the Defendant around the mid-term and around October 2014, 201, demanding I to request I to the staff of the tax office having well known inside the tax office to conclude a tax investigation well, “J” and “K” at the above office of the Defendant around the mid-term and around October 2014, and received KRW 5,00,000 in cash in terms of teaching expenses from I.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation or good offices concerning cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Defendant A, and Defendant B, from around 2003, run N in M., Defendant A, a person engaged in real estate development business, and Defendant A, a around 2006, visited each other as a customer of the “N” and become aware of the fact that Defendant A had become aware of the fact.