The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: although the defendant's mistake is recognized as a whole, it seems that the wife and two children are in a position to support the defendant, and the victim D of the crime of special intimidation in this case has already expressed his intention that he would not want the defendant's punishment at the court below, although the defendant has already been punished several times due to the crime of violence, and each of the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties in this case is a crime of damaging the State's function by nullifying legitimate exercise of public power, it is necessary to severely punish the defendant. The crime of damage to public goods in this case and attempted damage to public goods in this case is also a crime of damaging the State's function. In light of the motive, circumstance, etc. that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case, the quality of the crime is very poor and the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case's situation before and after stopping each of the crimes in this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and occupation conditions in the records, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.