The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. 항소이유의 요지 피고인이 원심 판시와 같이 중앙선을 침범하여 트럭을 유턴한 사실이 있기는 하나, 이 사건 사고는 피고인이 유턴을 마치고 도로변 공간에 트럭을 정차한 이후에 마주 오던 버스 기사 E이 피고인의 트럭을 지나친 상태에서 피고인의 불법유턴에 항의하기 위하여 버스를 급정거하면서 피해자들이 앞으로 튕겨져 나가 야기된 것으로 교통사고발생보고서에 첨부된 도면에 의하더라도 버스가 트럭 앞에 정차된 상태임을 알 수 있는바, 피고인의 불법유턴과 피해자들의 상해 사이에는 인과관계가 없음에도 이 사건 공소사실 중 교통사고처리특례법위반의 점을 유죄로 인정한 원심은 사실오인 및 법리오해의 위법이 있다.

2. In the investigation agency, approximately 15 meters prior to the point of accident, at the court below and the court of the first instance, the defendant's driver's truck was found at approximately 20-30 meters prior to the opposite lane and attempted to stop rapidly (it also stated that the defendant's truck was discovered at a nearest distance after being asked by his counsel about the operation distance at the time of rapid stop). And the victim G also found that the truck was seated on the right edge of the bus in the police and took play snow as above, while the bus article stated that the bus article was a brac, supporting the above statement about the situation of the rapid stop of the E, each of the above statements is reliable, and there is no reason to reject it, and according to each of the above statements, it is recognized that the defendant's illegal collision of the bus is found.

On the other hand, E stated that it was difficult to use the bus because it was short of the truck which was temporarily parked in the court below at the court below.