logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.09.27 2016고단1587
관세법위반등
Text

Defendant

A In six months of imprisonment, the defendant corporation B is punished by a fine of KRW 50 million, and the defendant corporation C is punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is substantially operating B and C.

Defendant

B(Representative Director: A) is a corporation that imports motor vehicle parts in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and engages in export and wholesale retail business.

Defendant

C(Representative Director: A) is a corporation that engages in wholesale business of new automobile parts in Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do.

1. If it is intended to import goods in violation of the Customs Act, the name, standard, quantity, and price of the relevant goods and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree shall be reported to the head of a customs office, and the dutiable value shall not be falsely reported in order to exercise influence over the determination

Defendant

A around July 18, 201, in the name of "B", import declaration from the Incheon Customs Office, import declaration from the YU YONGYU AU AUTRALAL, hereinafter referred to as "WU YU YAL") to the Chinese post, and importing from the name of "B", an individual business entity, 50 HE, which is a part of motor vehicle, even though the actual transaction price is 80,00 U.S. dollars, it filed an import declaration with 40,000 U.S. dollars, and filed an import declaration with 3,427,104 won equivalent to the difference between 40,000 U.S. dollars and the attached Form, including:

1. The customs duty amounting to US$465,577 (Korean US$526,371,322) was evaded upon filing a declaration of low-price of 465,577, even though the actual transaction price of the imported goods cleared 16 times in total from November 29, 2012 to November 29, 2012 was US$952,127, which was 42,109,706.

2. No dealer of trade, goods, etc. in violation of the foreign trade law with respect to a stock company B shall commit any act of falsely indicating the origin;

A. Defendant A (1) On November 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) imported in China five valves from the actual 800 Hdembs, one of which was marked by the Incheon Customs Office as “Originating country of origin: China”; and (b) the valves imported from China, one of five of the actual 80 Hdembs, marked by the Incheon Customs Office as “Originating country of origin” from China.

arrow